Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices - Align the portfolio roadmap with the enterprise architecture target state
Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices
Align the portfolio roadmap with the enterprise architecture target state
Overview
The portfolio roadmap and the enterprise architecture target state are complementary views of the same organizational future - the portfolio roadmap describes which applications will be added, changed, and retired; the enterprise architecture target state describes the architectural principles, patterns, and standards that the evolved portfolio should embody. When these two views are developed and maintained independently, they frequently diverge: the portfolio roadmap generates investments that move the portfolio away from the architectural target state, or the architecture target state becomes a theoretical aspiration disconnected from the portfolio investments that would actually be required to achieve it and that are not in the portfolio roadmap.
Best Practice
Develop and maintain the portfolio roadmap in explicit, documented alignment with the enterprise architecture target state. Every major portfolio investment should be assessed against its contribution to architectural target state achievement - does this investment move the portfolio measurably closer to or further from the target state? Conversely, the enterprise architecture target state should be informed by the portfolio investments that are feasible given the organization’s financial and organizational capacity - the target state should be architecturally ambitious but achievable given the portfolio’s current position and the investment trajectory that the portfolio roadmap makes explicit. Review the alignment between roadmap and target state at least annually and whenever either is significantly updated.
Benefit(s)
An aligned portfolio roadmap and enterprise architecture target state produces a technology evolution path that is both strategically directional and operationally achievable. Every portfolio investment contributes to architectural progress rather than creating additional architectural debt that moves the portfolio further from the target state. The enterprise architecture target state is grounded in portfolio reality rather than existing only as a theoretical ideal that no realistic investment trajectory can achieve. The organization develops a coherent technology direction that leadership, architecture teams, and application teams can all understand, contribute to, and commit to with confidence that their individual efforts are aligned with the overall organizational direction.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers