Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices - Build and maintain key mappings between applications and the business capabilities they support
Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices
Build and maintain key mappings between applications and the business capabilities they support
Overview
An application inventory that does not connect applications to the business capabilities they support is an IT inventory, not a portfolio management tool. Without the business capability connection, it is impossible to answer the questions that business leadership asks about the portfolio: what technology supports our most critical business capabilities? What happens to our customer service function if we retire this application? Which of our applications are genuinely strategic and which are merely operational? These questions require the capability mapping that most application inventories do not maintain.
Best Practice
Establish and maintain an explicit mapping between every application in the portfolio and the business capabilities it supports. The mapping should capture the degree of support: is the application the primary enabler of the capability, a significant supporting tool, or a peripheral contributor? Review the mapping when a business capability changes in strategic priority or operational definition, and whenever an application’s functional scope changes significantly. Use this mapping as a primary input to rationalization analysis: applications that are the primary or sole enabler of high-criticality capabilities receive heightened protection; applications with low or no capability alignment become candidates for priority review.
Benefit(s)
Business capability mapping elevates APM from an IT discipline to a business intelligence tool. Portfolio decisions become grounded in business impact rather than technical preference. Business leaders can see which applications are essential to their most important capabilities and participate meaningfully in portfolio decisions because the connection between technology and business outcome is explicit and traceable. Rationalization efforts become more productive and more credible because applications are assessed in the context of what they enable for the organization rather than in isolation from business purpose.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers