Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices

Overview

Without a formal vendor management policy, vendor relationships are governed inconsistently. Procurement decisions are made without consideration of portfolio implications or concentration risk. Renewals are executed without competitive assessment. Exit provisions are not negotiated at contract inception and become crisis-driven when the relationship needs to end. The accumulated effect of ungoverned vendor management is a vendor landscape that is more expensive, more concentrated, less well-contracted, and more difficult to exit than it would be if managed through a defined policy framework from the outset.

Best Practice

Develop and publish a formal vendor management policy governing the full vendor relationship lifecycle. The policy should address: criteria and process for evaluating and approving new vendors; standard contract terms required in every material vendor agreement including data ownership provisions, portability rights, audit rights, termination for convenience provisions, and exit assistance obligations; the renewal governance process and minimum preparation timeline; the escalation process for vendor performance issues; and the transition management requirements for ending vendor relationships including data return obligations and migration support periods.

Benefit(s)

A formal vendor management policy produces a vendor landscape that is contracted more favorably, governed more consistently, and exitable more deliberately than one governed by ad hoc individual decisions. Procurement decisions are made with portfolio awareness and strategic intent. Contracts include exit provisions negotiated at a time of organizational strength. Renewal governance produces consistently better commercial terms. The organization develops the vendor management maturity that reduces both the financial cost and the strategic risk of its vendor relationships - dimensions of value that compound positively when the policy is consistently applied.