Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices - Manage license compliance - know what you own, what you use, and what you owe
Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices
Manage license compliance - know what you own, what you use, and what you owe
Overview
License compliance gaps - situations where the organization is using software beyond its licensed entitlement in quantity, scope, or authorized use case - create financial and legal exposure that is both significant and entirely preventable with adequate portfolio governance. Software vendors conduct structured audit programs that identify compliance gaps and seek retroactive payment, frequently with penalty provisions, for unlicensed usage. The cost of a major software audit finding routinely exceeds the annual cost of an APM program by a substantial margin. And unlike most financial risks, license compliance gaps can be substantially eliminated through adequate inventory governance and utilization monitoring.
Best Practice
Establish a license compliance management process that continuously tracks the relationship between licensed entitlement and actual deployment for every material license in the portfolio. Maintain the licensed quantity, the deployed quantity, the active user count where applicable, and the resulting compliance position for each license. Set automated alerts when deployed quantities approach licensed limits. Conduct a formal compliance review before every renewal negotiation to establish the current compliance position and right-size the renewal accordingly. Extend compliance review to open-source components in custom-developed applications to ensure that open-source license terms are honored in all derivative works.
Benefit(s)
Proactive license compliance management eliminates the financial exposure created by compliance gaps before they are discovered through vendor-initiated audit programs. The cost of a compliance audit finding - retroactive license fees, penalties, and internal remediation costs - is avoided. The organization’s position in renewal negotiations is strengthened because its compliance posture is known, documented, and defensible. The legal risk of unintended license violations is reduced to the level that proactive governance and monitoring can achieve.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers