Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices - Measure portfolio coverage - know how completely the inventory captures all applications
Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices
Measure portfolio coverage - know how completely the inventory captures all applications
Overview
Portfolio coverage - the percentage of applications that actually exist in the enterprise that are captured in the managed portfolio - is the most fundamental quality dimension of any APM program. An inventory with high coverage but imperfect data quality is useful and improvable. An inventory with high data quality for the applications it contains but significant coverage gaps is an inventory that presents a false picture of completeness while leaving a significant portion of the portfolio’s cost, risk, and complexity outside governance. Coverage gaps are invisible by definition - an organization does not know about the applications it does not know about - which makes systematic coverage monitoring more important than any other portfolio quality discipline.
Best Practice
Establish a portfolio coverage monitoring process that uses multiple independent data sources to estimate coverage and detect gaps. Compare the portfolio application count against IT spend records, CMDB entries, network scans, and periodic business unit interviews to identify discrepancies that suggest missing applications. Track coverage trend over time - the ratio of newly discovered applications to the total managed portfolio in each discovery cycle reveals whether discovery processes are keeping pace with the rate of new application adoption. Set a coverage target based on the organization’s APM maturity stage and track progress toward it. Treat coverage as a primary KPI in portfolio health reporting to leadership, recognizing that it directly determines the completeness of every analysis that the portfolio supports.
Benefit(s)
Monitoring portfolio coverage ensures that the APM program knows the limits of its own visibility and communicates those limits honestly to the leadership that relies on portfolio intelligence for decisions. Leaders who know that the portfolio covers ninety-two percent of estimated application spend make different and better decisions than leaders who believe the portfolio is complete when it actually covers sixty-eight percent. Coverage monitoring also drives the discovery investment that steadily closes the gap between managed and unmanaged portfolio - producing both improved governance and improved financial oversight as previously unknown applications are brought under management.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers