Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices - Understand the two-tier inventory ownership model - centralized for cross-enterprise inventories, federated for operationally-homed inventories
Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices
Understand the two-tier inventory ownership model - centralized for cross-enterprise inventories, federated for operationally-homed inventories
Overview
APM depends on data from many inventory sources with fundamentally different ownership characteristics. Some inventories describe enterprise assets that exist across all organizational boundaries - applications, software licenses, subscriptions, integrations, contracts, leases, and vendor relationships - and have no single operational team that naturally owns them. Other inventories describe operational events and outcomes - defects, incidents, changes, performance metrics - that are generated and maintained by specific operational teams as a core part of their function. Treating all these inventories with the same ownership model produces either a bottleneck at the center or a fragmentation problem at the edges.
Best Practice
Apply the two-tier ownership model explicitly and document it in the APM Governance Policy. Cross-enterprise inventories with no natural operational home should be centrally owned by Enterprise Architecture or an equivalent enterprise-spanning function. The Applications Inventory, Software Licenses Inventory, Software Subscriptions Inventory, Data Integrations Inventory, Vendors and Suppliers Inventory, Data and Information Assets Inventory, and similar enterprise-spanning collections are owned and governed at the enterprise level because they serve the enterprise as a whole and their quality must meet enterprise-level standards. Operationally-homed inventories should remain with their operational owners. APM consumes this data as an authorized consumer under a formal data-sharing arrangement, not as an owner acquiring control of data that belongs elsewhere.
Benefit(s)
The two-tier ownership model resolves the centralization-versus-federation tension by applying each approach where it fits best. Cross-enterprise inventories are consistent and authoritative because they are centrally governed. Operational inventories are accurate and current because they are maintained by the teams that generate and understand the data. APM gains access to a rich, multi-source portfolio view without creating ownership conflicts or imposing maintenance burdens on operational teams that have their own governance frameworks and operating rhythms.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers