Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices - Use AI to analyze the portfolio and surface patterns, gaps, and redundancies
Application Portfolio Management (APM) Best Practices
Use AI to analyze the portfolio and surface patterns, gaps, and redundancies
Overview
Manual portfolio analysis is constrained by the analytical bandwidth of the team conducting it. A human analyst reviewing a portfolio of several hundred applications can identify the most visible patterns, gaps, and redundancies - but will miss the subtler cross-dimensional relationships that require synthesizing data from multiple inventories simultaneously and analyzing it across multiple analytical dimensions at once. As portfolio scale grows toward hundreds or thousands of applications with connections to multiple supporting inventories, the gap between what manual analysis can discover and what is actually present and actionable in the portfolio data grows proportionally, leaving significant organizational value unrealized.
Best Practice
Use AI to conduct pattern, gap, and redundancy analysis across the portfolio and its connected inventories as a regular analytical activity, not only as an occasional deep-dive exercise. Provide the AI with the current portfolio data and ask it to identify: applications in the same functional category serving the same or overlapping user populations that are candidates for redundancy consolidation review; capability areas where no application or a significantly underinvested application serves a business capability the organization currently requires; applications whose cost trajectory is growing while their utilization or business value is declining, indicating emerging waste; vendor relationships whose total portfolio presence creates concentration risk above defined thresholds; and EOL technology patterns that indicate systemic technical debt in specific technology categories requiring coordinated remediation rather than application-by-application response.
Benefit(s)
AI-assisted pattern analysis surfaces portfolio insights that manual analysis would miss entirely or take significantly longer to identify - particularly the cross-dimensional insights that require simultaneously considering multiple analytical dimensions for which no single analyst or analyst team has sufficient bandwidth at portfolio scale. Redundancy consolidation opportunities are identified with a completeness that manual functional categorization cannot achieve because AI can process the full portfolio simultaneously. Capability gaps are surfaced across the full portfolio rather than only in the specific areas that human analysts happen to examine in a given analysis cycle. Cost trends signaling emerging financial problems are detected before they become budget overruns. The organization develops a portfolio analytics capability that continuously improves as inventory quality matures and AI capabilities advance.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers