Capabilities Inventory and Attributes - Glossary of Terms and Phrases
Capabilities Inventory and Attributes
Chapter 2. Glossary of Terms and Phrases
The following terms are used throughout this document with specific meanings. Terms defined in the IF4IT Enterprise Inventory Management Best Practices document or in discipline-specific Best Practices documents (APM, TPM, etc.) are not duplicated here — refer to those documents for broader inventory governance and discipline-specific vocabulary.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Capability | A discrete, outcome-oriented area of organizational ability — what the enterprise does or must do, independent of how it is currently organized, which process performs it, or which technology supports it. Stable across organizational changes; processes and technologies are not. |
| Capability Hierarchy | The structured tree of Capabilities organized from a root (Level 0, the enterprise) through Level 1 branches and downward into successively more specific sub-capabilities. Every Capability except the root has exactly one parent Capability. |
| Capability Map | The complete, governed representation of the enterprise Capability Hierarchy in a visual or structured format. The Capabilities Inventory is the data foundation of the Capability Map. |
| Function | A specific organized activity the enterprise performs. In some frameworks Function is distinguished from Capability; in the IF4IT model both are treated as Capabilities, with function-level nodes appearing as deeper-level entries in the hierarchy. |
| Latent Capability | A Capability that the enterprise possesses but has not yet exercised — abilities that exist in potential because the people, systems, and authority are in place, but no organized activity is currently performed. |
| Aspirational Capability | A target-state Capability the enterprise is building toward as part of a strategy or transformation. The Capability is planned but not yet active. |
| Decayed Capability | A Capability the enterprise formally retains but where competence has eroded — the activity continues but at degraded performance, often because of staff loss, deprecated technology, or process drift. |
| Semantic ID | The structured, human-readable, AI-friendly unique identifier assigned to every Capability following the enterprise naming convention. For Capabilities, the path-based form (e.g., /Enterprise/Core Business Capabilities/Human Capital Management/Resource Training and Education) is recommended; the tokenized form (e.g., CAP-FIN-AP-INV-PROC) remains acceptable. Permanent and never reused once assigned. |
| Hierarchy Identifier | A dotted-notation positional identifier (e.g., 1.1.2.3) reflecting a Capability’s current position in the hierarchy. Used for sorting, compact display, and conversational reference. Positional and changes with reorganization — must not be used as a durable cross-reference identifier. |
| Leaf Capability Name | The terminal segment of a Capability’s hierarchical path — the name of the Capability considered in isolation from its ancestors. Derived from the final segment of the Semantic ID when the path-based form is used. |
| Parent Capability Path | The full path from the root of the Capability Hierarchy to the immediate parent of a given Capability, expressed as a forward-slash-delimited string ending with a trailing slash (e.g., /Enterprise/Core Business Capabilities/Human Capital Management/). The root has a Parent Capability Path of “Not Applicable”. |
| Business Classification | The broad business domain to which a Capability belongs, drawn from the IF4IT recommended top-level decomposition: Industry-Specific, Core Business, or Information Technology (IT). Corresponds directly to the three Level 1 branches of the recommended Capability Hierarchy. |
| Owning Organization | The organizational unit that has administrative ownership of a Capability and is fully accountable for it — typically the unit where the Business Owner sits. Distinct from Service Organization. |
| Service Organization | The organizational unit that actually performs the day-to-day work related to a Capability. May be the same as the Owning Organization or different (when work is delegated, outsourced, or run by a shared-services unit). May be internal, external, or hybrid. |
| Investment Priority | The enterprise’s stated direction for capability investment: Invest (actively develop and strengthen), Sustain (maintain at current level), or Disinvest (reduce investment and plan for exit). |
| Assessed Maturity | A practitioner evaluation of how well the enterprise performs a Capability relative to peers and industry standards: Exceeds Industry, On-Par w/ Industry, Lags Industry, or Non-Existing. |
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers