Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices - Define the minimum viable data set versus the comprehensive data collection goal — per inventory type
Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices
Define the minimum viable data set versus the comprehensive data collection goal — per inventory type
Overview
One of the most common failure modes in technology inventory programs is attempting to capture the comprehensive data set from the outset and failing to capture even the minimum viable data set as a consequence. The minimum viable data set is the set of attributes that must be present for governance to be meaningful at all. Capturing the minimum viable data set completely and accurately is more valuable than capturing the comprehensive data set incompletely and inaccurately.
Best Practice
Define distinct minimum viable data sets for each Technologies Inventory type, reflecting the governance-critical attributes specific to each category. The shared minimum viable data set across all inventory types includes: semantic identifier; taxonomy classification; named Technology Owner; current lifecycle status; Rationalization Posture; Strategic Disposition; Technology Standards Register status; and last governance review date. Beyond the shared minimum, each inventory type has category-specific minimum viable attributes. For the Software Technologies Inventory: vendor or community source, primary license type, and current deployed versions. For the Hardware Technologies Inventory: acquisition date, end-of-useful-life date, and physical location. For the Cloud and Infrastructure Services Inventory: cloud provider, service region, and current monthly cost. For the IP and Standards Technologies Inventory: the legal protection type and the license or standard version currently in force. For the Open Source Components Inventory: the SPDX license identifier and the applications that directly depend on the component. For the Emerging and Experimental Technologies Inventory: the evaluation scope, the evaluation timeline, and the governance body responsible for the adoption decision.
The comprehensive data collection goal — the full set of attributes that a mature TPM program maintains for each inventory type — should be documented alongside the minimum viable data set, with a roadmap for progressing from minimum viable to comprehensive as the program matures.
Benefit(s)
Defining the minimum viable data set per inventory type before beginning data collection prevents the program from becoming paralyzed by the gap between what exists and what the comprehensive goal requires. Organizations that start with a clearly defined minimum viable data set consistently achieve complete, accurate minimum viable coverage faster than those that attempt comprehensive coverage from the outset.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers