Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices - Define what leadership needs from TPM dashboards and reports
Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices
Define what leadership needs from TPM dashboards and reports
Overview
TPM dashboards and reports serve different leadership audiences with fundamentally different information needs. The CIO needs a portfolio-level health view that enables strategic investment decisions. IT domain leaders need category-level and rationalization program status views that enable operational governance decisions. Financial leadership needs cost, debt, and ROI views that enable budget and investment decisions. The enterprise risk committee needs technology risk and compliance views that enable risk governance decisions. Designing a single dashboard that serves all of these needs simultaneously produces a dashboard that serves none of them well. Effective TPM reporting design begins with a clear definition of what each leadership audience needs to see, at what level of detail, on what cadence.
Best Practice
Define the information needs of each leadership audience before designing any TPM dashboard or report, and design each reporting artifact explicitly for its intended audience and its intended decision support purpose. For the CIO: a portfolio health scorecard that shows the overall Rationalization Posture and Strategic Disposition distribution across the full Technologies Inventory family, the aggregate technology debt burden and trend, the Technology Currency profile, the top technology risks and their remediation status, and the technology investment allocation across maintain, modernize, and innovate categories. Updated quarterly, presented in a single-page executive format. For IT domain leaders: category-level portfolio views showing the Rationalization Posture and Strategic Disposition distribution within each taxonomy category, the rationalization program pipeline and status, the EOL and end-of-support exposure, and the wasted spend identification. Updated monthly. For financial leadership: total cost of technology by category and trend, wasted spend recovery in the period, technology debt financial quantification, and the technology investment ROI metrics. Updated quarterly. For enterprise risk governance: the technology risk register summary showing all material technology risks by severity and remediation status, the compliance gap count by applicable regulatory framework, and the open source security vulnerability exposure by severity. Updated quarterly.
Benefit(s)
Audience-designed TPM dashboards and reports produce the leadership engagement that generic portfolio dashboards consistently fail to achieve. Leadership stakeholders who receive information at the level of detail and in the format that serves their specific decision responsibilities engage with technology portfolio governance as an informed governance practice rather than as an IT administrative function they must approve periodically without the context to evaluate it. The governance program develops organizational credibility through the quality and relevance of its reporting rather than through the volume of data it produces.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers