Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices - Distinguish between strategically differentiating technologies and commodity technologies
Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices
Distinguish between strategically differentiating technologies and commodity technologies
Overview
Not all technologies in the portfolio deserve equal governance investment. A technology that represents a genuine source of competitive differentiation — one whose capabilities, characteristics, or implementation give the organization an advantage that competitors cannot easily replicate — warrants different governance treatment than a commodity technology that performs a standard function available from multiple equivalent alternatives. The distinction matters for investment decisions: differentiating technologies justify significant investment in optimization, security, and capability development. Commodity technologies should be governed for cost efficiency, standardization, and vendor leverage rather than for investment in differentiation.
Best Practice
Include the differentiating versus commodity distinction as an explicit attribute of every technology assessment and Strategic Disposition assignment. A technology is strategically differentiating when its specific implementation, configuration, or integration gives the organization a capability that competitors cannot easily replicate, when it supports a business capability that the organization has identified as a source of competitive advantage, or when it embodies proprietary intellectual property or unique expertise that represents organizational value. A technology is a commodity when it performs a standard function available from multiple equivalent alternatives, when its implementation is largely indistinguishable from equivalent implementations at peer organizations, and when switching to an alternative would not materially disadvantage the organization competitively. Commodity technologies should be governed toward standardization, lowest-cost provision, and maximum vendor leverage. Differentiating technologies should be governed toward investment, security, and continuous improvement.
Benefit(s)
The differentiating versus commodity distinction focuses governance investment where it produces the greatest competitive and strategic return. Commodity technologies are rationalized and standardized aggressively, freeing the budget and governance capacity that those technologies consume for reallocation to the differentiating technologies that warrant it. Differentiating technologies receive the investment in security, capability development, and architectural evolution that their strategic contribution justifies. The organization stops treating all technologies as equally deserving of equal governance attention and starts directing its governance resources to where they produce the greatest organizational value.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers