Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices - Maintain a pipeline of technologies under evaluation
Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices
Maintain a pipeline of technologies under evaluation
Overview
The Emerging and Experimental Technologies Inventory functions as the governance record of the technology evaluation pipeline. But a record alone is insufficient — the pipeline requires active management to ensure that evaluations progress to conclusions, that evaluation scopes are enforced, that timelines are respected, and that governance decisions are made at the right moments rather than deferred indefinitely. A technology evaluation pipeline without active management consistently accumulates technologies in indefinite evaluation status, producing a holding inventory that grows without resolving, with no governance decisions being made and no governance value being produced.
Best Practice
Actively manage the technology evaluation pipeline as a formal governance process with named owners for every active evaluation, defined milestones within each evaluation, and a governance body review at each milestone. At minimum, review the full evaluation pipeline monthly to: confirm that every active evaluation has a named owner, a current scope, and a timeline with a defined conclusion date; identify evaluations that have exceeded their timeline and require either extension approval or conclusion; identify evaluations where the scope has exceeded the original authorization and require scope reconfirmation; and surface evaluations that are ready for a governance decision and require scheduling of the formal adoption or rejection review.
Benefit(s)
Active management of the technology evaluation pipeline converts the Emerging and Experimental Technologies Inventory from a passive holding area into a dynamic governance process that produces decisions at the pace that modern technology exploration requires. Every evaluation has an active owner, a current timeline, and a defined conclusion mechanism. Technologies that are not worth adopting are rejected explicitly rather than drifting indefinitely in evaluation status. And the governance function maintains a current view of the full organizational technology exploration landscape, enabling strategic coordination between evaluation efforts and organizational technology direction.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers