Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices - Use FinOps data to inform technology rationalization and migration decisions
Technology Portfolio Management (TPM) Best Practices
Use FinOps data to inform technology rationalization and migration decisions
Overview
FinOps analysis produces cost visibility and optimization data that is directly relevant to technology rationalization and migration decisions in the TPM governance framework. A cloud service with high cost and low utilization relative to its provisioned capacity may be a rationalization candidate. A SaaS platform with low utilization across a large licensed user population may warrant a migration to a better-adopted alternative. A cloud provider concentration analysis may reveal a provider lock-in risk that the Technology Spread data from the Technologies Inventory does not fully capture. FinOps data is not only a financial optimization input; it is portfolio intelligence that enriches the technology assessment and rationalization process.
Best Practice
Establish a formal data flow from the FinOps practice to the TPM governance function that delivers cloud and SaaS cost visibility data, utilization data, and optimization recommendations as inputs to the technology assessment and rationalization cycle. For each technology assessment: include current cost, utilization rate, and cost trajectory data from FinOps analysis as inputs to the Total Cost of Technology calculation and the financial dimension of the technology assessment. For the annual rationalization review: use FinOps analysis to identify the technologies with the highest cost-to-utilization ratio as rationalization priority candidates. For migration planning: use FinOps data to quantify the cost implications of technology migration options, including the transition cost during migration and the steady-state cost on the target platform after migration is complete.
Benefit(s)
Connecting FinOps data to the technology rationalization process produces rationalization decisions that are grounded in financial evidence rather than limited to technical and strategic assessment. Technologies that appear technically sound and strategically tolerable based on architectural assessment but that carry disproportionate cost relative to their utilization are identified as financial rationalization candidates by the FinOps data connection. Migration decisions are quantified with financial modeling that reflects actual cost data rather than estimates. And the organization develops a technology governance capability that integrates financial, technical, and strategic intelligence rather than treating financial management and technical management as separate, unconnected disciplines.
Copyright for the International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT): 2008 - Present
Legal Disclaimers